Let's speculate on the 6th sense euh Blockchain

#1

So, To add a bit of fun, speculation, guesses, share our likings and disagreements on which blockchain could be the 6th element.
Contenders I could see: Ardor, Komodo, Vechain, Ark, Substratum, litecoin
Let’s share our guesses

1 Like
#2

Decred :smiley: haha

3 Likes
#3

Rootstock, Decred, Zilliqa, EOS

2 Likes
#4

Zilliqa has their mainnet?

Rootstock is bitcoin smart contract, doubtfil.

EOS is the enemy haha. But I could see that. Decred too.

1 Like
#5

EOS ??? goes against all the “validator” argument of the team, would be like XRP. I exited all invest in EOS after the 1st month of mainnet.
Decred indeed, forgot it, very decent and solid project. So yeah maybe a newer project like Zilliqa is possible also. Or a lower cap.

1 Like
#6

The member chains have no requirements, e.g., Lisk, Neo… It’s BC that needs to be decentralized.

2 Likes
#7

I do see EOS as way too much centralized to be in the BC team’s choice. Specially with their issues about block producers.

#8

Urbit , Decred

1 Like
#9

How is EOS any different from NEO?

#10

XCP - Counterparty

1 Like
#11

It isn’t that much, only thing is that NEO Consensus nodes don’t have as much power over the network as EOS has (blocking adresses and such, making it a police and not just a validator)
But you kinda caught me here I have to say…

#12

Counterparty doesn’t have its own blockchain.

1 Like
#13

QP8KPqTmKr7KMA7KDZhyvsdfAASVvAhLV9REEHdY1Rt2qombQEiJ

3 Likes
#14

Hehe, a hash? The course is on then.

#15

601a336801a0146373c9bb626da9b22b1e2e6563db96919b32c03f7b374d3385

#16

Nope … they already said not :wink: haha

#17

Is this an address?

#19

No idea what your hexadecimal string means, but Patrick’s is not hexadecimal. :yum:

1 Like
#20

I do, @ElYassine’s string is an eth private key that opens this adress 0x68Da91895FAea5eCDebfbF9127Da139dBe704668
So, the string given by Patrick might be a private key of some sort. (not an ETH one)
Lazy to search more now.
Oh, btw, it’s an empty wallet (in case any of you felt like checking)

#21

Hmmm… flag it?